要想加深读书后的印象，你打算怎么写读后感呢，读后感是小伙伴们读完书后都要认真的，下面是路路文书网小编为您分享的《野性的呼唤》短读后感5篇，感谢您的参阅。
《野性的呼唤》短读后感篇1
在暑假里，我读了《野性的呼唤》一书。这本书是美国作家杰克·伦敦的著作。
当时的美国还处于资本主义发展的初始阶段，人们为了得到黄金，都纷纷赶往北极寻找。因而需要很多壮实的狗去拉雪橇。
这本书描述了主人公巴克，也是被卖到北极的狗之一。当刚刚到北极的时候，巴克就亲眼目睹了自我同伴遭受当地狗的攻击而惨死。而它也第一次感受到大棒的残酷，从此便信奉了‘大棒’和‘利齿’的法则。经过几次跟换主人，巴克落入了三个根本不适合在北极探险的男女。就在巴克即将和他们陷入困境的时候，一个名叫桑顿的男子救了它。从而使巴克对他逐渐地产生了好感，不惜生命的危险，三次将桑顿从死亡的边缘拉回。因为桑顿被印第安人杀害，为了替主人报酬，巴克疯狂地撕咬印第安人的喉咙。最终回归了大自然。
巴克在小说中是一个强者的身份出现。它那英勇的表现，那强壮的身姿，时不时地浮此刻我的眼前。要想在这个社会立足，我们就得学会像巴克那样有坚韧的生活意志，顽强的生存力和机敏的生存。仅有这样我们才能够在这个社会上存活下去。
在这本书的末尾，作者这样写道：“它放开它的喉咙，唱出一支原始的年轻世界的歌，一支狼的歌。”这语句是多么的雄壮，多么的豪迈啊！
这就是一只狗——巴克的传奇故事！
《野性的呼唤》短读后感篇2
at the beginning of this century, many new writers emerged with the introduction of many new ideas. among them, jack london was the most popular one.
his most famous novel is the call of the wild 。 although it is a story about a dog, buck, it vividly depicts the life in the primitive north where people rushed for gold and fortune.
buck, used to belong to a judge, was kidnapped and sold to north. then he became a member of a dog-team pulling a sled 。 in the days of pulling a snow-sled, he learned to conform to the law of nature and obey the master. finally, he found a basic instinct hidden inside him, which enabled himself to survive the tough environment. this is the call of the wild.
when you read the story, you will feel that buck is a man instead of a dog, struggling with his fortune and conforming to the law of nature.
though short, it is really a thrilling story. what you never forget is the tough life in the nature, the brave and crafty dog. maybe the wild is calling you to go ahead.
while writing for only 16 years throughout his life, london produced an amazing body of work among which, white fang, martin eden, the valley of the moon are representative.
《野性的呼唤》短读后感篇3
远古的渴望在激荡，奋力挣脱世俗的锁链，再次从隆冬的沉睡中，唤醒那野性的情愫。这是对一整本书的概括，这本书就是野性的呼唤。
野性的呼唤是一位名叫杰克伦敦的美国人写的。杰克伦敦笔下的巴克充满野性，他是从一只被驯化的南方犬，竟发展到似狗非狗，似狼非狼的野蛮状态。
我觉得这本书虽然是一个动物的故事，但在主题和处理上却与其他的动物故事不同。这本书中，他描写的虽然是动物的世界，但杰克伦敦亲切的巴克的代名词改成了“他”。那时，我就在想杰克是不是想通过对狗的描写，表达出他自身的一些感情吗？读完了整本书后，我又去查了杰克的简介，最后，终于试着理解杰克写作的意图。它通过对巴克的地遭遇和斗争历程描绘，歌颂了英雄主义者坚忍不拔的奋斗精神，表达了他对获得自由，快乐的渴望。
在我读这本书的时候，似乎在看一部三d电影呢！在巴克被人类残忍打杀时，我不禁心头一紧，担心着巴克还能继续挺下去吗？在巴克与别的狗争雄的时候，我又期待，到底谁才是最后的赢家……仿佛这一切都发生在我的眼前。
不过，在读书的同时，我也在想一个问题？人性为什么是那么的残忍呢？你看，那些主人为了能早时淘到金，每天让那些小狗早出晚归，又不给什么吃的，还让它们睡在冰天雪地里。等它们老了，要死了，不中用了，人们就把它们抛弃，目的就是为了不拖累自己。没死、但奄奄一息的狗，人们就用枪把这些苦役狗打死！可这些狗呢，他们似乎一生下来就是奴隶，一生都在为人类奉献，可人类却残忍的把它们置于死地。人性就是这样，贪婪，懒惰，残忍！
好在，主人公巴克遇上了一个真心爱他的主人桑顿。只要人类真心待动物，动物也会真心待人。瞧！巴克多次在危难时刻连自己的命都不管，冒着生命危险去救桑顿，这不就是人与动物和谐相处吗！如果每个人都能与动物和谐相处，该有多好！
《野性的呼唤》短读后感篇4
看了杰克·伦敦（jacklondon1876—1916）的短篇小说《野性的呼唤》（thecallofthewide），薄薄的一本小书，带来深深的思索。书中描写了一只名叫巴克的狗从一只家养宠物，变成一只适应蛮荒之地艰苦生活的工作犬，最终心中的野性被唤醒而成为一只狼王的故事。使我思考。
人为什么具有向上的精神，渴望挑战，敢于铤而走险，甘愿忍受随之而来的肉体和心灵的折磨？这可能源于原始的本能，即对食物和异性的欲望。在群居野生动物中，经过决斗，勇猛、狡诈的王者可以获得最多的异性和最好的食物。人的最基本的需求也是如此。但是文明社会中的人仅有勇猛、狡诈的品质还不够，更需要拥有智慧、技巧去战胜其他猎手与猎物。
文明社会的人想要得到自己需要的事物，首先要具有能够在蛮荒社会中，在棍子与牙齿的法则下能够生存所必须具备的野蛮本能。这样才能敢于拼搏、敢于争取自己的需求；其次，要拥有智慧。文明社会比蛮荒社会在形式的层面上复杂，虽然两个社会在本质上是一样的，都信奉棍子与牙齿的法则，但如果在斗争中不讲究方式、方法，不适应文明社会形式上的要求，就会失败。
总之，个体想在群体中更好地生活，需要原始的野性，原始的欲望，不要让其被各种因素所束缚，所磨灭。这些因素包括道德因素、客观环境因素；也需要现代的技巧与狡诈，来打败对手，壮大自己。
《野性的呼唤》短读后感篇5
" he sings a song of the younger world, which is the song of the pack." （chapter vii the sounding of the wild） when the last sentence vanished from my eyes, i can still perceive an echo of a song - a wild song, which knocks up my dizzy mind that always cheerfully sink into the so-called civilized world without questioning. wild, is no longer a symbol of the law of jungle but a headspring where streams out love, passion, bravery, loyalty, friendship, venture, competition and tolerance all these virtues can easily be found in the call of the wild.
jack london （1876-1916） is a worldwide renowned novelist. his stories successfully reflect the contradictory views of man’s nature and destiny in and against the wild, and his "fight to survive" notion has gained him and his works timeless popularity, particularly, the call of the wild.
it tells a story of a gigantic dog, named buck, who is stolen from a rich and comfortable home and forced to learn to survive as an alaskan sled dog. buck, at first, is too savage for the company of man until he coincidently encounters his beloved master-kindhearted john thornton. finally, john’s incidental death breaks buck’s last tie to the man and drives him into his long-desired wild with his pack. in the story, buck and john simply adopt themselves to answer the call of the wild. when it comes to buck’s mind that one day he will eventually leave john- his master, all he wants to do is just to help him finish the gold-rush-trip. he " from then on, night and day, never put a halt, in desperation, he burst into long stretch of flight, did not to stay him （john）…" （chapter vii the sounding of the wild） buck wished to remember john’s image forever, he "for two days and nights never left camp, never let thornton out of his sight. he followed him about at his work, watched him while saw him into blankets at night and out of them in the morning…" （chapter vii） when i read these words i just could not hold my tears bursting. can a real man devote himself to loyalty and friendship in such a way? on the other hand, john thornton is not only a dog-lover but also a brave and venturous man. he is so straightforward and simple that makes him an accommodating man. once he firmly roots a goal into his heart, it seems that nothing could prevent him from accomplishing it except death. i do not know whether the persistence is the most vital element to make a man successful, but what i know is that you are not far away from success once you occupy it.
it is jack london who plunges me into the animated wild from the hustle-and-bustle and from desperate city. there, i merely cannot deny the attraction of buck’s bark, which enlightens me to pursue another lost half of the nature in mankind, and to dig out a true meaning of life. dare we imagine that london intentionally employs buck to set us a model with perfect characters （count barbarity out）？ the answer is affirmed. we, as animals, are from the wild but shedding off more and more wild signs, which demonstrate us as the "uncivilized". however, who can fully guarantee that we have not overlooked some essential wild-endowed virtues? especially, nowadays, it seems more crucial for us to stop looking at the post-industrialized world and to ponder for a while. when cheats, betrayals, lies, lusts and crimes stuff a materialized society, whether london uses this novel to help himself escape the reality or warn the earthy people, to us, modern man, is all the same.it appears horrible that in modern society many people are enthusiastically talking about how to build up "special relations" to the authority, deceiving and lying to each other.
to them life is a mask-wearing process rather than a hard work. every time, you browse webpages, scandals in politics, business, the entertainment circle and even on campus crowd into your eyes. oh, what is the essence of human beings? what is the civilization to us? do we need to look back at where we came from? is it good or bad for us to speak out what we think and to do what the consciences demand us to? are we wasting talents given by the mighty nature? be an honest, straightforward, warmhearted, emotional and responsible man or be a shrewd, cold hearted and astute hypocrite? while embracing the "civilized" rubbish, we are losing those good virtues, which are the calls of the wild. once we lose them, we are to lose ourselves, and we will get nowhere. i wish this dreadful thought is totally a fallacy, but, now, it is chilling me hard.
one day when i happen to stand on the top of a grand mountain to observe a boundless prairie enveloped by the sapphire firmament and combed by gusts of the rhythmical west wind, a morning sun sprinkles me her warmth and brilliance in a graceful way, however, at that moment, i am afraid that i cannot appreciate these beauties, i am a lost " civilized man" then.
